Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
[x]

deviantART

 
About Me Member Nature Photographer infernal-moltresMale/Australia Recent Activity Deviant for 5 Years
Needs Premium Membership
Statistics 71 Deviations
3,979 Comments
9,967 Pageviews

The temptation...

Sun Oct 5, 2008, 2:52 AM
  • Mood: Happy
  • Listening to: 'Wonderful Tonight' by Michael Buble & Ivan Li
  • Drinking: Bailey's
After a disappearance of close to a year I was contemplating on coming back here. As planned, I had put stuff on Flickr, and even started a webpage. But really, it's all the same, except there's more of a community down here. It's been a pleasant surprise to see how some of my old buddies here are still active and better at their art than ever before.

I've been working as a vet for about 15 months now and while things were initially a blur and incomprehensible, things are starting to come back to me. But in the beginning it was painfully obvious as to how much of your Uni stuff you forget, just by being stuck in the military for a couple of years doing conscription.

Well, I guess being called a 'maggot' in there didn't help much either. Nevertheless, an experience I would never forget, and one which I would never get anywhere else in the world, and not ever, if I had not been forced to do it.

Anyway, things at the workplace have been a rollercoaster ride. Hot and cold days. On some days I'm happily laughing with clients (not that I've received many 'thank you' letters though), and on other days I'm slumped in the chair wondering why I'm actually working in such a job for a miserable X amount of dollars per hour.

Then I think that perhaps I should have taken up photography as a career. That would be unrealistic however, given the state of my art. So, I'd rather keep things simple. Continue to be a vet, maybe things will just get easier. I don't know what the heck I was smoking when I decided to take up this job, but hey, they said it might be a 'calling'.

Wow.

That sounds a little more grand and sophisticated, doesn't it? :P

Anyhow, with a few hundred more pictures on my computer since the last time I posted anything here, I might as well sift through them and start putting them up here.

There's this Canon Photo5 competition going on in Australia that I've been busy with for a number of weeks now and there's just one entry (out of 5) that needs to be done. Those will be posted here also in due time. Not now. Can't afford to give ideas away, right?

deviantID

Devious Info

  • Current Residence: Australia
  • Interests: Photography and all its vices, and in every form
  • Favourite movie: Forrest Gump
  • Favourite genre of music: Bossa Nova
  • Favourite poet or writer: Stephen King
  • Operating System: Mac OS Leopard...if that's important
  • MP3 player of choice: Sony NWZ-S618F
  • Shell of choice: Looking for one on the beach
  • Wallpaper of choice: Photographs that I've taken previously
  • Skin of choice: Crocodilian...scaly and repulsive
  • Favourite gaming platform: PC
  • Tools of the Trade: Canon EOS 1Ds, Manfrotto 055Pro + 488RC2, Photoshop, Wacom Graphire3

deviantART Community Board

[x]

Comments


:iconunpolarizable:
Hey, nice tutorial on night photography! (I am also a cannon user and nature/wildlife photographer) I was wondering what you find to be the best glass for shooting animals?
:iconinfernal-moltres:
Thanks, glad you found it helpful. The one Canon telephoto that lots of people talk about is the 500mm f/4L. It's a lens I'd like to have but cannot afford. Below that is also the well reviewed 400mm f/5.6L and the 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L.

I've used the latter in the past and found performance to be excellent in good light at most focal lengths from wide open. Things are a little more patchy close to the 400mm end and occasionally images can look a little soft if taken in less than ideal conditions. This is even is shutter speeds were fast enough with IS to prevent camera shake, and the subject was fairly static.

All in all, for a good buy on a budget, I'd be taking the 100-400L. I have an even smaller budget, so I use a 1960s Leica 400mm f/5 which is all manual, but gets me the same amount of reach as that aforementioned zoom, and at around one-third of the price!

--
Avatar by: ~sockeye-salmon
Night Photography Tutorial
:iconunpolarizable:
Thanks for the recommendation! I was looking at the 400 f/5.6 so it's nice to hear it come up. It's cheaper than the 100-400 f/4-5.6 and much sharper at 400 mm. Plus I already have the 70-200 f/4 IS so I wouldn't really miss the zoom. Anyways, thanks for the reply!
:iconinfernal-moltres:
There would be some sample variation in the 100-400L zooms. In some cases people have tested it to be as sharp as the 400L at the same focal length and aperture setting. The zoom however loses in terms of AF speed. If you won't miss the rest of the zoom range, the 400L is a good choice as a birding lens where you can usually achieve fast shutter speeds. For general travel photography the zoom might still be better for semi-static subjects because of the IS.

--
Avatar by: ~sockeye-salmon
Night Photography Tutorial
:iconpiczeels:
WOW, you have some amazing work!! love it!

--
Piczeels Photography, Australia

Member of pentaxda [link]
:iconlabaha90:
good work... ^^



--


While there’s a life, there’s a hope


:new: While there’s a will, there’s away


All doors are open to courtesy


if your home from glass did not throw the stonon pepole :pray:


my web

[link] [link] [link] [link] [link] [link] [link] [link]


[link] [link] [link]
 





--
يوتيوب جريدة منتديات
:iconmitchfielder:
preeeetty much everything has been said but oh well lol.

awesome work, keep it up

--
This device has been modified...
:iconsingapore-lah:
You have a great gallery :)

--
Cme join the Singapore-LAH group !

Site Map